From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 10238] Re: [PATCH] Re: netconsole still hangs
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:20:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080319142010.ed564c39.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080319191724.GA2756@ami.dom.local>
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:17:25 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:47:29PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> > Anyway... My first tests seemed to hang the box with syslog only. Now
> > I can't repeat it neither with syslog nor netconsole... So, this patch
> > is a bad hit or it's really about timing.
>
> I've just repeated this this test with syslog only. After letting it
> go for ~5 min. I couldn't break it with any keys for at least next 10
> min., and I turned the power down. Then the same but with this sched.c
> patch reverted: ^C worked after a few seconds. It looks like time
> can really matter here.
Yeah, I was fiddling with that. If you do
for i in $(seq 100)
do
echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
done
then yes there's no response to ^C and the machine is basically dead. But
when the loop finishes, things return to normal.
Perhaps it's something to do with longer holds on tasklist_lock, something
liek that.
> So, maybe it's again something accidental, I don't have another box
> around to stay idle while repeting this test, but it seems this could
> be not the best way to compare anything with 2.6.24 or older.
No. I still haven't retested on the other offending machine. Right now
I'm not sure that we any longer have anything which needs fixing. Apart
from merging netpoll-zap_completion_queue-adjust-skb-users-counter.patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 23:14 netconsole still hangs Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 6:10 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 6:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:12 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:48 ` Jike Song
2008-03-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-17 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 8:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 8:50 ` [Bug 10238] " Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 21:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 19:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 21:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-03-19 21:31 ` David Miller
2008-03-19 21:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 15:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-13 15:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080319142010.ed564c39.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).