From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kconfig symbol Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080320.142707.170694458.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1206038373.16475.150.camel@johannes.berg> <20080320.141307.173590705.davem@davemloft.net> <1206048106.16475.161.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, dsd-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1206048106.16475.161.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:21:46 +0100 > Yeah, good point. Should I rename it to HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > or similar? Or have it defined as some sort of number so you can make > actually make tradeoffs? Like Dave Woodhouse suggested at some point to > have get_unaligned() take an argument that indicates the probability... Yes, that name and something with a "score" of some sort would be nice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html