From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20080321121205.GG25225@elte.hu> References: <20080311011434.ad8c8d7d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080311202300.GA8957@vino.hallyn.com> <20080311133920.68dc410b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <64bb37e0803121233v30d12a58i77a1e23fd02ea6f2@mail.gmail.com> <20080312124420.3ba8c3d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <64bb37e0803121301u6f836710m9ebb30e065751bec@mail.gmail.com> <64bb37e0803131505u7ae920fdvbbed005cbeb8c98e@mail.gmail.com> <20080313153528.a11795b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1205449809.19403.40.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Torsten Kaiser , lkml , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Badari Pulavarty Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1205449809.19403.40.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Badari Pulavarty wrote: > Yes. I found the following patch to be the culprit. > > sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock > () thanks Badari, i've backed out this patch. Ingo