From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: add byteorder macros with alignment fixups
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:59:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080323135939.GC4580@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206040953.17059.13.camel@brick>
On Thu 2008-03-20 12:22:33, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Create linux/unaligned.h to hold a common pattern in the kernel:
>
> le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le32 *)x));
>
> Repeat for various combinations of le/be and 64/32/16 bit. Add
> a variant that operates on possibly unaligned pointers to
> byteorder/generic.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> ---
> Now the indirect include of asm/unaligned is opt-in when places
> add the linux/unaligned header.
>
> include/linux/unaligned.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/unaligned.h b/include/linux/unaligned.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7d8fddc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/unaligned.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_UNALIGNED_H_
> +#define _LINUX_UNALIGNED_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +static inline u64 le64_to_cpu_unaligned(void *p)
> +{
> + return __le64_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le64 *)p));
> +}
Why the cast? Should le64_to_cpu() take __le64 * parameter, so that normal
typechecking still works?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-23 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 17:34 [RFC PATCH] kernel: add byteorder macros with alignment fixups Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 18:29 ` Al Viro
2008-03-20 18:37 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 19:09 ` Al Viro
2008-03-20 19:22 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-23 13:59 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-03-24 16:35 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 19:41 ` [PATCH] kernel: add byteorder function " Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 20:16 ` [PATCH] kernel: create linux/unaligned.h Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 20:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-03-20 20:08 ` [RFC PATCH] kernel: add byteorder macros with alignment fixups H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080323135939.GC4580@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).