From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] [TCP]: Must count fack_count also when skipping Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080324.144107.235200795.davem@davemloft.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: fhimpe@telenet.be Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46700 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752437AbYCXVlI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:41:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Frederik Himpe Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:53:12 +0200, Ilpo J=E4rvinen > wrote: >=20 > > [PATCH net-2.6] [TCP]: Must count fack_count also when skipping > >=20 > > It makes fackets_out to grow too slowly compared with the real writ= e > > queue. > >=20 > > This shouldn't cause those BUG_TRAP(packets <=3D tp->packets_out) t= o > > trigger but how knows how such inconsistent fackets_out affects her= e and > > there around TCP when everything is nowadays assuming accurate > > fackets_out. So lets see if this silences them all. > >=20 > > Reported by Guillaume Chazarain . >=20 > Will this patch be applied to 2.6.24 stable? I think I have been hit = by=20 > the same problem recently: I'll push it to the -stable folks for their next release since people are actively hitting it.