* Re: [PATCH 3/3] [LLC]: zero station mac source address
[not found] <47e76799.1cef600a.7b83.6fea@mx.google.com>
@ 2008-03-24 17:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-03-25 5:18 ` Joonwoo Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2008-03-24 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joonwpark81; +Cc: davem, netdev
Em Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:34:30PM +0900, joonwpark81@gmail.com escreveu:
> From: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
>
> The right next device of the lo can have zero dev_addr. e.g. bonding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/llc/llc_core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/llc/llc_core.c b/net/llc/llc_core.c
> index 248b590..b871e10 100644
> --- a/net/llc/llc_core.c
> +++ b/net/llc/llc_core.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
> #include <net/llc.h>
>
> @@ -164,8 +165,9 @@ static int __init llc_init(void)
> struct net_device *dev;
>
> dev = first_net_device(&init_net);
> - if (dev != NULL)
> + do {
> dev = next_net_device(dev);
> + } while (dev && is_zero_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr));
>
> if (dev != NULL)
> memcpy(llc_station_mac_sa, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
Looks ok, but I think this is an area for further work, using just
the first device in the list always was wrong, I was too lazy to fix it,
but since you are working on it, please consider fixing this for good
:-)
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] [LLC]: zero station mac source address
2008-03-24 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] [LLC]: zero station mac source address Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2008-03-25 5:18 ` Joonwoo Park
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joonwoo Park @ 2008-03-25 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; +Cc: joonwpark81, davem, netdev
2008/3/25, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>:
> Em Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:34:30PM +0900, joonwpark81@gmail.com escreveu:
> > From: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
> >
> > The right next device of the lo can have zero dev_addr. e.g. bonding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > net/llc/llc_core.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/llc/llc_core.c b/net/llc/llc_core.c
> > index 248b590..b871e10 100644
> > --- a/net/llc/llc_core.c
> > +++ b/net/llc/llc_core.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> > #include <net/net_namespace.h>
> > #include <net/llc.h>
> >
> > @@ -164,8 +165,9 @@ static int __init llc_init(void)
> > struct net_device *dev;
> >
> > dev = first_net_device(&init_net);
> > - if (dev != NULL)
> > + do {
> > dev = next_net_device(dev);
> > + } while (dev && is_zero_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr));
> >
> > if (dev != NULL)
> > memcpy(llc_station_mac_sa, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>
> Looks ok, but I think this is an area for further work, using just
> the first device in the list always was wrong, I was too lazy to fix it,
> but since you are working on it, please consider fixing this for good
> :-)
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Arnaldo,
Please give me more hints :-)
First off, I wondered 'we need llc_station_mac_sa?'
IMHO, dev->dev_addr of egress interface for llc sa would be fine.
Do you happen to think this?
Thanks,
Joonwoo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-25 5:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <47e76799.1cef600a.7b83.6fea@mx.google.com>
2008-03-24 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] [LLC]: zero station mac source address Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-03-25 5:18 ` Joonwoo Park
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).