From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] New driver "sfc" for Solarstorm SFC4000 controller
 (try #8)
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080325.163740.38242006.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20080324102936.GZ24160@solarflare.com>
	<20080324.132253.110641003.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20080325125421.GB24160@solarflare.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com,
	jgarzik@pobox.com
To: bhutchings@solarflare.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48911
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756551AbYCYXhp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:37:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080325125421.GB24160@solarflare.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:54:23 +0000

> Would you object to our using this test until the default definition exists?

I'm trying to tell you that you should submit first a
patch that adds the default definition, as part of
your patch set.  Instead of papering around this
problem and waiting for the non-existent "someone else"
to do the work.