From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:06:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080327.160633.241066028.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5204C27573@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:55:34 -0700
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:43:42 -0400
> >
> >> But that seems like a quick id test, with no need for all that
> >> generic MSI test code.
> >
> > Yes, that is the way to do it.
>
> I get your point, but this seems a maintainance problem due to not being
> able to "future proof" the solution. I know what is (IDs) available
> now, but I don't know how many systems in the future IBM will release
> with a similar bridge but a different device ID that causes the same
> issue. Should we take on the maintenance of continually having to add
> every new bridge device that has this issue to our driver? Users just
> want this stuff to work when they plug it in.
This is exactly what the PCI quirks list is and it works just fine.
I know the truth is that Intel as a vendor frowns upon putting into
it's driver a list of another vendor's PCI IDs as errata items because
it looks bad.
So just be honest about that.
It is, however, the correct way to address this problem.
> tg3.c has exactly this kind of test and workaround (in fact its where I
> got the code) to work around the same kind of issues.
That is from an era when the situation was much different.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 18:36 [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts Auke Kok
2008-03-26 18:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-26 20:42 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-03-27 17:53 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 19:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-27 22:05 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 22:55 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 23:06 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-03-27 23:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-27 23:53 ` Kok, Auke
2008-03-28 0:03 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 21:59 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 22:05 ` Andy Gospodarek
2008-03-27 22:16 ` Kok, Auke
2008-03-27 22:33 ` Andy Gospodarek
2008-03-27 22:47 ` Kok, Auke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080327.160633.241066028.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).