From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080327.175939.165029213.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080327222248.GA3596@ami.dom.local> <20080327.152218.235944668.davem@davemloft.net> <20080327223913.GB3596@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, marcus@better.se, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu To: jarkao2@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35014 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752127AbYC1A7j (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:59:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080327223913.GB3596@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jarek Poplawski Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:39:13 +0100 > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:22:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > ... > > Instead of going back and forth like this can someone post > > just take it upon themselves to post such an obvious patch > > already :-) > > > > All of this "he'll do it, she'll do it" just wastes time. > > Right! She or he should also remember to add Peter's lockup > scenario and his signed-off-by... I didn't put in a Signed-off-by since Peter didn't give one, but I did give him credit for the discovery and I did list explicitly his given logic.