From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:07:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20080327100700.GA2845@ami.dom.local> References: <20080325134320.21525479.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47EAD8A5.3070806@gmail.com> <20080326171403.ad186037.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080327085542.GA2778@ami.dom.local> <20080327021812.601776b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, marcus@better.se, Stephen Hemminger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:55588 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805AbYC0KCZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:02:25 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so299145ugc.16 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080327021812.601776b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:18:12AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ... > Anyway, the accusation is that lockdep is busted, in that it doesn't realise that > local_irq_disable() blocks softirqs. Usually lockdep gets this right, so I've some doubts too. But here it's not only about softirqs; this: > >> Mar 25 19:48:46 better kernel: #1: (target_list_lock){--..}, at: [] means lockdep saw hardirqs enabled while acquiring/holding this lock. Jarek P.