From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: COMPLETE is a poor global identifier Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:53:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20080328105321.07873d93.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080328032449.cbc09f3b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080328153833.1074868a@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: i2c@lm-sensors.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby To: Jean Delvare Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41778 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753652AbYC1RyS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:54:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080328153833.1074868a@hyperion.delvare> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:38:33 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:24:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > powerpc allmodconfig: > > > > In file included from drivers/char/rio/rio_linux.c:81: > > drivers/char/rio/cirrus.h:202:1: warning: "COMPLETE" redefined > > In file included from include/net/netns/ipv4.h:8, > > from include/net/net_namespace.h:13, > > from include/linux/seq_file.h:7, > > from include/asm/machdep.h:12, > > from include/asm/pci.h:17, > > from include/linux/pci.h:951, > > from drivers/char/rio/rio_linux.c:50: > > include/net/inet_frag.h:28:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > > > > In file included from drivers/char/ip2/ip2main.c:128: > > drivers/char/ip2/i2ellis.h:608:1: warning: "COMPLETE" redefined > > In file included from include/net/netns/ipv4.h:8, > > from include/net/net_namespace.h:13, > > from include/linux/seq_file.h:7, > > from include/asm/machdep.h:12, > > from include/asm/pci.h:17, > > from include/linux/pci.h:951, > > from drivers/char/ip2/ip2main.c:95: > > include/net/inet_frag.h:28:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > > > > > > they should all be renamed. These can cause runtime failures, so it's not > > a trivial thing. > > How is this related to i2c? uh, I guess at 3:24AM ip2 and i2c look the same.