From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] drivers/atm/firestream.c: suppress uninitialized var warning Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:39:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20080328173946.23903be0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080328165437.bfd7726c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080328.165812.253071507.davem@davemloft.net> <20080328171128.ff03ec02.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080328.173523.66723417.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, jeff@garzik.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56728 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754333AbYC2AkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:40:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080328.173523.66723417.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:35:23 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:11:28 -0700 > > > Plus uninitialized_var() gives us something to grep for and > > experiment with if/when future gcc's get smarter. > > That's sounds like a great investment of your time. > > I guess there aren't any more interesting things to work > on, nor bugs to fix. So you're all outa reasons. I have explained our reasons for using uninitialized_var() rather than sprinkling =0 all over the place, that's all.