From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ep93xx_eth PHY problems Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:13:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20080329191307.665f2056@ors> References: <47CD4857.2060406@student.tuwien.ac.at> <20080321202202.129c1239@ors> <47E9D438.4090206@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hvr@gnu.org, buytenh@wantstofly.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:45017 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754024AbYC2SNm (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:13:42 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so894831fgb.17 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:13:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47E9D438.4090206@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:42:32 -0400 schrieb Jeff Garzik: > > ACKs from Lennert, others? > > I don't know enough about the hardware to say... > > Seems straightforward to me? > > 2.6.25 or 2.6.26 material? It depends on Herbert Valerio Riedel's ep93xx_eth phylib conversion, which isn't in 2.6.25-rc7 (but received an ACK from Lennert some weeks ago). I guess it should go in whenever that is merged. > > Any more testing results? > Sorry, I haven't had much time recently, so I haven't further investigated the autoneg off issue. I've seen it work fine sometimes, so it's either some very weird bug or something totally unrelated. -- Oliver