From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures. Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080402.114545.17950613.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080402171104.9591.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080402.012406.246863209.davem@davemloft.net> <1207134299.8514.771.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, csnook@redhat.com, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: peterz@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50461 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760841AbYDBSpp (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:45:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1207134299.8514.771.camel@twins> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:04:59 +0200 > Would we not hope that most net drivers can handle {,net}dev_alloc_skb() > failing? Otherwise we have some serious trouble. False presumption. Most can but some legacy ones really do not handle this well.