From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
e1000-list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices)
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:39:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080408183921.GA20803@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47FB9ABB.9080403@intel.com>
* Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
> > such driver transitions are never smooth. For example there's an
> > open e1000e/e1000 regression in .25 in this area that i just noticed
> > on a testbox while doing randconfig testing. (that's why i noticed
> > this message of yours on lkml, i was searching for e1000 regression
> > reports).
> This is really a vague report. Maybe you need to adjust your network
> setup to explicitly load the correct driver at boot? The adapter works
> correct here and I have a stock T60 here as well, just as you.
this is a simple bzImage kernel, no modules at all. Here's the full
regression report:
kernel used: latest -git, head 7180c4c9e09888db0a188f729c96c6d7bd61fa83.
Regression seems to have been introduced into v2.6.25 by this commit:
| commit 040babf9d84e7010c457e9ce69e9eb1c27927c9e
| Author: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 31 15:22:05 2007 -0700
|
| e1000/e1000e: Move PCI-Express device IDs over to e1000e
v2.6.25-rc8 regresses relative to v2.6.24, with the following config,
which config works fine in v2.6.24:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config.e1000.bad
the eth0 interface is not detected at all:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/dmesg.e1000.bad
after more than an hour of experimenting around and bisecting the
.config variances it turned out that turning off E1000E driver _module_
completely (which isnt even loaded, nor attempted to be loaded) made the
kernel boot again:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config.e1000.good
and the e1000 interface is detected fine just like it was in v2.6.24:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/dmesg.e1000.good
the difference in the config is:
--- config.e1000.good 2008-04-08 20:24:30.000000000 +0200
+++ config.e1000.bad 2008-04-08 20:20:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -1400,8 +1400,8 @@ CONFIG_DL2K=m
CONFIG_E1000=y
CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
# CONFIG_E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT is not set
-# CONFIG_E1000E is not set
-# CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED is not set
+CONFIG_E1000E=m
+CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED=y
# CONFIG_IP1000 is not set
# CONFIG_IGB is not set
CONFIG_NS83820=m
it results in the following bootup difference:
--- dmesg.e1000.good 2008-04-08 20:27:20.000000000 +0200
+++ dmesg.e1000.bad 2008-04-08 20:27:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -1269,14 +1269,8 @@ initcall 0xc06b7ce9 ran for 0 msecs: cpq
Calling initcall 0xc06b81e1: e1000_init_module+0x0/0x6e()
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k2-NAPI
Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
-ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
-PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64
-e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:16:41:17:49:d2
-e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: This device (id 8086:109a) will no longer be supported by this driver in the future.
-e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: please use the "e1000e" driver instead.
-e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
initcall 0xc06b81e1: e1000_init_module+0x0/0x6e() returned 0.
-initcall 0xc06b81e1 ran for 81 msecs: e1000_init_module+0x0/0x6e()
+initcall 0xc06b81e1 ran for 0 msecs: e1000_init_module+0x0/0x6e()
Calling initcall 0xc06b824f: e100_init_module+0x0/0x4d()
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k4-NAPI
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation
@@ -2087,7 +2080,6 @@ warning: `dbus-daemon' uses 32-bit capab
Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting <?>
Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number d2-49-17-ff-ff-41-16-00
- Kernel driver in use: e1000
03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 1010
so the pure presence of the e1000e module breaks the e1000 driver. That
is a regression and a bug that should be fixed.
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m.,
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 21:11 [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:31 ` Dave Hansen
2008-04-04 21:49 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 14:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 16:18 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 18:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-08 19:32 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:56 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:47 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 19:38 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:50 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 20:12 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 18:29 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 21:23 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-10 21:52 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 7:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-11 0:46 ` Philip Craig
2008-04-11 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 16:22 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 17:26 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 17:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 19:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 19:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-11 19:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 20:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 21:01 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-11 22:06 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 22:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:05 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 23:15 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:58 ` david
2008-04-12 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-13 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-13 21:34 ` Ondrej Zary
2008-06-09 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 17:10 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-09 20:49 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Frans Pop
2008-04-09 23:59 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 9:57 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 14:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 17:55 ` Grant Grundler
2008-04-10 18:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-10 18:26 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:20 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-10 19:27 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 21:35 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-08 20:31 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 15:40 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-11 19:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-10 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-04-11 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:43 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-04-08 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:12 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:36 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:39 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:13 ` showing which hardware is unclaimed Rick Jones
2008-04-08 20:35 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:17 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:08 ` [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080408183921.GA20803@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).