From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080412.024952.151646629.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080411151821.GA32398@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080411.110702.146231359.davem@davemloft.net> <20080412084400.GA30259@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, lkml@rtr.ca, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, tilman@imap.cc, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: w@1wt.eu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50376 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757747AbYDLJtw (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:49:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080412084400.GA30259@1wt.eu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Willy Tarreau Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:44:00 +0200 > While it is a powerful tool, we must accept that it cannot efficiently > work in some circumstances, such as : Everyone is well aware of all of this, that's why I specifically asked for a bisect, because I knew it would be crucial to pinpointing this particular bug. And lo' and behold in 15 minutes after the bisect results were available it got fixed. Yes it takes judgment, and nobody ever suggested that a revert is the way to go. Git bisect results must be parsed by a human brain. Nothing else was ever implied in any way shape or form.