From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080417.232047.27944044.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080415.203108.55491723.davem@davemloft.net> <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC002AABC73@nt-irva-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tonyb@cybernetics.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: mchan@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56029 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753372AbYDRGUr (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:20:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC002AABC73@nt-irva-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Michael Chan" Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:40:25 -0700 > Isn't it better to test for skb->data? That's where we tell > the hardware to start transmitting. That's correct.