From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080417.235257.06267707.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080416.023551.70464279.davem@davemloft.net> <000201c89fd1$308edf30$6b5ee183@D2GT6T71> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, johnwheffner@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: wenji@fnal.gov Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40494 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754762AbYDRGw4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:52:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000201c89fd1$308edf30$6b5ee183@D2GT6T71> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Wenji Wu Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:50:19 -0500 > >I've added John's patch to net-2.6.26 > > I just tried with John's patch. It works, saturating the 1Gbps in my test. > > Without the patch, the throughput is around 180Mbps with SACK On, 250Mbps > with SACK off. > > The same test environment described in my previous emails. After this patch cooks for a couple more days I'll submit it to -stable. Thanks for your report and all of your testing Wenji. Thanks John for the patch.