From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Cc: tomasz@grobelny.oswiecenia.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:42:12 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422.154212.108914213.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080422174152.GD6039@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:41:52 +0100
> | If we iron this out we could finally return to the main subject of this
> | thread. That is Patch v2 by me and Gerrit...
> | --
> Fully agree - we just need to decide whether or not to use skb->priority.
>
> Below is as far as I got in integrating your patch last week, it shows
> only the major changes. The following bits have been updated:
>
> * skb->priority now cleared before passing the skb onto layer 3;
> * order of statements in prio_push() reversed (first dropping worst
> skb and then pushing the new skb - this is better when e.g.
> tx_qlen=1);
> * added general parsing routine for cmsg(3) socket control messages
> and defined one for the SOL_DCCP socket level; thanks to advice
> by Dave Miller
If this usage of skb->priority is going to override the
IP_TOS socket option setting, I don't think it's a good
idea.
Right now every packet output goes through ip_output.c
which sets skb->priority to sk->sk_priority, which is set
by the user via the IP_TOS socket option in ip_sockglue.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-11 10:24 [PATCH 0/5] [DCCP]: Queuing policies Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-14 6:50 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-14 7:39 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Gerrit Renker
2008-04-14 23:45 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 15:14 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-15 15:21 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-15 18:01 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-16 6:20 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-16 8:36 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv3 " Gerrit Renker
2008-04-17 20:03 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 " Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-18 10:13 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-19 20:42 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-20 16:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-20 20:12 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-21 11:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-21 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-21 16:17 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-22 4:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-22 20:45 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-22 22:06 ` David Miller
2008-04-23 0:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-22 17:41 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-22 22:42 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-25 19:33 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-25 20:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-25 20:58 ` David Miller
2008-04-28 7:21 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 7:39 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 17:30 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-22 20:30 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 13:10 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 15:19 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv3 " Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 20:12 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 21:03 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 " Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-30 7:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-02 20:39 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-05-02 20:56 ` Gerrit Renker
[not found] ` <20080424220704.0483DBC12@poczta.oswiecenia.net>
2008-04-24 22:16 ` [PATCH 1/1] [DCCP][QPOLICY]: External interface changes Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 15:08 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 21:29 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 19:38 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 20:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-17 20:20 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 20:14 ` inconsistent lock state with kernel 2.6.24.4 Bernard Pidoux
2008-04-16 7:43 ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Gerrit Renker
2008-04-17 18:03 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-17 18:29 ` Gerrit Renker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080422.154212.108914213.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz@grobelny.oswiecenia.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).