netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Cc: tomasz@grobelny.oswiecenia.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:42:12 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422.154212.108914213.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080422174152.GD6039@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>

From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:41:52 +0100

> | If we iron this out we could finally return to the main subject of this 
> | thread. That is Patch v2 by me and Gerrit...
> | -- 
> Fully agree - we just need to decide whether or not to use skb->priority.
> 
> Below is as far as I got in integrating your patch last week, it shows
> only the major changes. The following bits have been updated:
> 
>  * skb->priority now cleared before passing the skb onto layer 3;
>  * order of statements in prio_push() reversed (first dropping worst
>    skb and then pushing the new skb - this is better when e.g.
>    tx_qlen=1);
>  * added general parsing routine for cmsg(3) socket control messages
>    and defined one for the SOL_DCCP socket level; thanks to advice
>    by Dave Miller

If this usage of skb->priority is going to override the
IP_TOS socket option setting, I don't think it's a good
idea.

Right now every packet output goes through ip_output.c
which sets skb->priority to sk->sk_priority, which is set
by the user via the IP_TOS socket option in ip_sockglue.c

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 10:24 [PATCH 0/5] [DCCP]: Queuing policies Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-14  6:50 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-14  7:39   ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Gerrit Renker
2008-04-14 23:45     ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 15:14       ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-15 15:21         ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-15 18:01           ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-16  6:20             ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-16  8:36               ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv3 " Gerrit Renker
2008-04-17 20:03               ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 " Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-18 10:13                 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-19 20:42                   ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-20 16:57                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-20 20:12                       ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-21 11:45                         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-21 13:12                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-21 16:17                             ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-22  4:56                               ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-22 20:45                                 ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-22 22:06                                   ` David Miller
2008-04-23  0:03                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-22 17:41                               ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-22 22:42                                 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-25 19:33                                   ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-25 20:40                                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-25 20:58                                       ` David Miller
2008-04-28  7:21                                   ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28  7:39                                     ` David Miller
2008-04-22 17:30                     ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-22 20:30                       ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 13:10                         ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 15:19                           ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv3 " Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 20:12                             ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 21:03                           ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 " Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-30  7:53                             ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-02 20:39                               ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-05-02 20:56                                 ` Gerrit Renker
     [not found]                         ` <20080424220704.0483DBC12@poczta.oswiecenia.net>
2008-04-24 22:16                           ` [PATCH 1/1] [DCCP][QPOLICY]: External interface changes Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-28 15:08                           ` Gerrit Renker
2008-04-28 21:29                             ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 19:38         ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 20:04           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-04-17 20:20             ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-15 20:14           ` inconsistent lock state with kernel 2.6.24.4 Bernard Pidoux
2008-04-16  7:43           ` [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set Gerrit Renker
2008-04-17 18:03             ` Tomasz Grobelny
2008-04-17 18:29               ` Gerrit Renker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080422.154212.108914213.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz@grobelny.oswiecenia.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).