netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: therbert@google.com
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, johnwheffner@gmail.com, rick.jones2@hp.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Socket buffer sizes with autotuning
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080424.233643.250240829.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65634d660804242234w66455bedve44801a98e3de9d9@mail.gmail.com>

From: "Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:34:50 -0700

> Queuing in the host as opposed to in the TX NIC might be beneficial to make
> work conserving queuing disciplines more effective, since once a packet is
> queued in the NIC the host can no longer perform any more scheduling on
> it.    In fact, we have been working on a mechanism to dynamically limit
> queuing in the NIC (by number of bytes), so that more packets will be queued
> in host.  This seems to give better results with some of the qdiscs (I can
> post a patch if there's interest in this).

This work is interesting, but doesn't it make more sense to limit by
number of packets instead of bytes?

No intermediate node that I know of drops bytes, they drop packets
instead :-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-25  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-23  0:38 Socket buffer sizes with autotuning Rick Jones
2008-04-23  2:17 ` John Heffner
2008-04-23  3:59   ` David Miller
2008-04-23 16:32     ` Rick Jones
2008-04-23 16:58       ` John Heffner
2008-04-23 17:24         ` Rick Jones
2008-04-23 17:41           ` John Heffner
2008-04-23 17:46             ` Rick Jones
2008-04-24 22:21     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-24 22:39       ` John Heffner
2008-04-25  1:28       ` David Miller
     [not found]       ` <65634d660804242234w66455bedve44801a98e3de9d9@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-25  6:36         ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-25  7:42           ` Tom Herbert
2008-04-25  7:46             ` David Miller
2008-04-28 17:51               ` Tom Herbert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-23 23:29 Jerry Chu
2008-04-24 16:32 ` John Heffner
2008-04-25  0:49   ` Jerry Chu
2008-04-25  6:46     ` David Miller
2008-04-25 21:29       ` Jerry Chu
2008-04-25 21:35         ` David Miller
2008-04-28 18:30       ` Jerry Chu
2008-04-28 19:21         ` John Heffner
2008-04-28 20:44           ` Jerry Chu
     [not found]           ` <d1c2719f0804281338j3984cf2bga31def0c2c1192a1@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-28 23:28             ` John Heffner
2008-04-28 23:35               ` David Miller
2008-04-29  2:20               ` Jerry Chu
2008-04-25  7:05 ` David Miller
2008-05-07  3:57   ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-07  4:27     ` David Miller
2008-05-07 18:36       ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-07 21:18         ` David Miller
2008-05-08  1:37           ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-08  1:43             ` David Miller
2008-05-08  3:33               ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-12 22:22                 ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-12 22:29                   ` David Miller
2008-05-12 22:31                     ` David Miller
2008-05-13  3:56                       ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-13  3:58                         ` David Miller
2008-05-13  4:00                           ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-13  4:02                             ` David Miller
2008-05-17  1:13                               ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-17  1:29                                 ` David Miller
2008-05-17  1:47                                   ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-12 22:58                     ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-12 23:01                       ` David Miller
2008-05-07  4:28     ` David Miller
2008-05-07 18:54       ` Jerry Chu
2008-05-07 21:20         ` David Miller
2008-05-08  0:16           ` Jerry Chu
     [not found] <d1c2719f0804241829s1bc3f41ejf7ebbff73ed96578@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-25  7:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-25  7:28   ` David Miller
2008-04-25  7:48     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080424.233643.250240829.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).