From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20080425105835.62e80537@core> References: <200804241820.m3OIKlMK017580@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20080425042957.GA17699@2ka.mipt.ru> <517f3f820804242343g22700872tf31f0c15047e70e2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Evgeniy Polyakov" , "Ulrich Drepper" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "Michael Kerrisk" , "Jakub Jelinek" To: "Michael Kerrisk" Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:59182 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760173AbYDYKGV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:06:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <517f3f820804242343g22700872tf31f0c15047e70e2@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > What about sigset there too? > > Right. That was what I was understanding that Alan referred to when > he was talking about paccept() Actually I hadn't thought about the sigset at all. Alan -- "I work for a government agency so please forgive me for not having the latest version of the kernel." -- Ryan Clayburn