From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dale Farnsworth Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mv643xx_eth: inter-mv643xx SMI port sharing Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:24:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20080428182450.GF2691@farnsworth.org> References: <20080423232959.GG17159@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from xyzzy.farnsworth.org ([65.39.95.219]:60414 "EHLO xyzzy.farnsworth.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936853AbYD1SY6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080423232959.GG17159@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 01:29:59AM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > There exist chips with up to four mv643xx_eth silicon blocks but > only one external SMI (MII management) interface -- the SMI logic > of the first block is shared by all the blocks. > > Handle this by allowing a per-port override of which > mv643xx_eth_shared's SMI registers (and spinlock) to use. > > Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Acked-by: Dale Farnsworth