From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dale Farnsworth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20080429154447.GA18560@farnsworth.org> References: <20080423232642.GB17159@xi.wantstofly.org> <4816B762.3070600@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lennert Buytenhek , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from xyzzy.farnsworth.org ([65.39.95.219]:41404 "EHLO xyzzy.farnsworth.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756463AbYD2PpD (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:45:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4816B762.3070600@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:51:30AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Lennert Buytenhek wrote: >> This (bisectable) patch series (posted previously to netdev@ on Mar >> 17 and on Mar 19) allows instantiating multiple mv643xx_eth instances, >> which is necessary for newer chips that contain multiple mv643xx_eth >> silicon blocks, and adds support for programming mv643xx_eth's mbus >> address window registers. >> >> These five patches were not merged in the initial batch of >> mv643xx_eth patches that went into 2.6.25-git because they depend >> on a0916bd64a0e6636f0161480e04057c89e90c5da ("[POWERPC] mv643xx_eth: >> Prepare to support multiple silicon blocks") to be merged first, >> which has now been merged (via the powerpc tree.) > > looks fine to me. I'll assume the maintainer will send me a pull > request or something... Yes. Coming later today. Thanks, -Dale