From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: New driver "sfc" for Solarstorm SFC4000 controller.
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:09:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080502110908.93c79d81.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080502160530.GN14219@solarflare.com>
On Fri, 2 May 2008 17:05:35 +0100 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> > Oh dear, it found
> >
> > #5617: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c:1877:
> > + if (*(volatile u32 *)dma_done == FALCON_STATS_DONE)
> >
> > which was naughty of you. Perhaps this was already discussed in review
> > with the people who actually know what they're talking about.
>
> There wasn't any specific discussion of this. Is it wrong? We want to
> prevent the compiler from caching *dma_done, which is itself written by DMA.
Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt has some dicussion.
> ...
> > > +#define EFX_DRIVER_VERSION "2.2.0136"
> >
> > I would suggest that you remove this. It's just not a useful way of
> > establishing what version of the driver your users are running. We use the
> > kernel version information for this.
>
> This is common practice for net drivers. Maybe we are in our own little
> world on netdev?
That would make it easy for a researcher to work out how often we change a
driver versus how often we increment its private version number.
> > > +static inline int efx_init_rx_buffer_page(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue,
> > > + struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf)
> > > +{
> > > + struct efx_nic *efx = rx_queue->efx;
> > > + int bytes, space, offset;
> > > +
> > > + bytes = efx->rx_buffer_len - EFX_PAGE_IP_ALIGN;
> > > +
> > > + /* If there is space left in the previously allocated page,
> > > + * then use it. Otherwise allocate a new one */
> > > + rx_buf->page = rx_queue->buf_page;
> > > + if (rx_buf->page == NULL) {
> > > + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > > +
> > > + rx_buf->page = alloc_pages(__GFP_COLD | __GFP_COMP | GFP_ATOMIC,
> > > + efx->rx_buffer_order);
> >
> > I don't think we should be using the open-coded __GFP_COMP here. That's
> > more an mm-internal thing.
>
> What's the alternative?
Just remove the __GFP_COMP, I expect. __GFP_COMP will ask the page
allocator to add extra book-keeping info to the pageframe (via
prep_compound_page()). I doubt if the driver uses that information.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200804301925.m3UJPc72001651@hera.kernel.org>
2008-05-01 19:08 ` New driver "sfc" for Solarstorm SFC4000 controller Andrew Morton
2008-05-02 16:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-02 18:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-06 12:50 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-06 14:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 15:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-06 15:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 15:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-07 17:55 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-02 19:10 ` Michael Brown
2008-05-03 20:01 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080502110908.93c79d81.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).