From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: paccept Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 15:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080508.155841.88051498.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200805062118.m46LI7SS004041@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20080508153822.0c4dd6e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080508225043.0A84026FA85@magilla.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davidel@xmailserver.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru To: roland@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55474 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765761AbYEHW6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 18:58:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080508225043.0A84026FA85@magilla.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Roland McGrath Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT) > It's now spelled: > > set_restore_sigmask(); > > For the other syscalls that depend on this (e.g. sys_ppoll), > we just put the whole definition in #ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK. > > The few machines that don't have RESTORE_SIGMASK support of some flavor, > also have not assigned numbers to the syscalls that need it. I notice that this macro also sets the sigpending bit, although some paths that end up calling set_restore_sigmask() already do that.