From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] avoid kobject name conflict with different namespaces Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 10:28:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20080508102844.25642ef7@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20080506173030.653828076@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <20080506173335.922289888@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <20080507190838.GA4467@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Greg KH , Benjamin Thery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Al Viro , Daniel Lezcano , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Pavel Emelyanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Return-path: Received: from mtagate2.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.135]:6522 "EHLO mtagate2.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752991AbYEHI2y (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 04:28:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:54:27 -0700, ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > I thought that s390 also used it, but I don't see > > that usage in the tree anymore, perhaps they switched to something else. > > That is the device_move -> kobject_move case. Yes. bluetooth also uses it, IIRC. > Very similar (and nice > if we can figure out how to combine them). Sounds like a good idea. I can test the _move() stuff (after I've managed to find some time to try this patchset...)