From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: R?mi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:22:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514172204.GA1036@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482B0DF8.9060001@redhat.com>
| The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be
| returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero?
They are probably both not important enough to be returned in the
default list.
But either is important be considered when a user unambiguously specifies
ai_socktype and/or ai_protocol; to avoid bad/brittle workarounds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-14 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-13 7:28 [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM Gerrit Renker
2008-05-13 7:39 ` David Miller
2008-05-13 9:37 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-13 15:50 ` David Stevens
2008-05-13 16:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-05-13 16:59 ` David Stevens
2008-05-13 17:06 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-05-13 17:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-05-13 17:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-05-13 17:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-05-13 17:03 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-13 17:37 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-05-13 17:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-05-13 19:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 8:09 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-14 14:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 14:45 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-14 16:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 17:22 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2008-05-14 17:43 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 18:00 ` Gerrit Renker
2008-05-14 17:39 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2008-05-14 17:49 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-05-14 18:07 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 17:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-14 17:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-05-14 18:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-13 22:34 ` David Miller
2008-05-13 12:53 ` Remi Denis-Courmont
2008-05-13 13:46 ` Gerrit Renker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080514172204.GA1036@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdenis@simphalempin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).