From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:25:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20080515182504.GB2936@ami.dom.local> References: <20080515091216.GA6550@ff.dom.local> <8ECDBB4EB5394859BFFACAAEE3A6EDB0@uglypunk> <482C6040.9030808@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kingsley Foreman , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:35784 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751871AbYEOS0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 14:26:25 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so226621nfc.21 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482C6040.9030808@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:09:36PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... > Do things improve if you set txqueuelen to a larger value > *before* configuring the qdiscs? BTW, I hope it was *before*, but since pfifo_fast_enqueue() uses "qdisc->dev->tx_queue_len" does it really matter? (Until it's before the test of course...) Jarek P.