netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: race in skb_splice_bits?
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 02:59:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805280259.30931.opurdila@ixiacom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080527172849.GA14746@2ka.mipt.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 740 bytes --]

On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> Please try attached patch on top of vanilla tree.
> It does not use skb after socket was dropped, but instead search it
> again when socket is locked, so if socket is alive, it will find it and
> clean otherwise it will exit.
>

This fixes the crash, thanks.

One doubt though: suppose that while we drop the lock the skb gets aggregated 
with the one after it. If the original skb is fully consumed in the receive 
actor, then the we will eat the new, aggregated skb, loosing data. 

Here is a patch, based on your idea, which tries to cope with the above 
scenario. The !skb check was added for the case in which the actor does not 
consume anything in the current interration. 

tavi


[-- Attachment #2: a.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1040 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 0a9002b..0a0a663 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1358,7 +1358,8 @@ done:
 
 	if (spd.nr_pages) {
 		int ret;
-
+		struct sock *sk= __skb->sk;
+ 
 		/*
 		 * Drop the socket lock, otherwise we have reverse
 		 * locking dependencies between sk_lock and i_mutex
@@ -1368,9 +1369,9 @@ done:
 		 * we call into ->sendpage() with the i_mutex lock held
 		 * and networking will grab the socket lock.
 		 */
-		release_sock(__skb->sk);
+		release_sock(sk);
 		ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
-		lock_sock(__skb->sk);
+		lock_sock(sk);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 3e91b28..34049d0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1227,7 +1227,8 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
 				copied += used;
 				offset += used;
 			}
-			if (offset != skb->len)
+			skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq-1, &offset);
+			if (!skb || (offset+1 != skb->len))
 				break;
 		}
 		if (tcp_hdr(skb)->fin) {

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-28  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-27  0:25 race in skb_splice_bits? Octavian Purdila
2008-05-27  2:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-27 10:41   ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-27 11:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 11:08   ` Ben Hutchings
2008-05-27 11:52     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 11:56       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 12:53         ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-27 13:21           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 14:03             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 14:39               ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-27 15:09                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 15:12                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 15:22                     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 15:33                       ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-27 15:47                         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 17:28                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-27 23:59                             ` Octavian Purdila [this message]
2008-05-28  8:52                               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-28 13:20                                 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-28 14:11                                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-28 15:20                                     ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-28 15:42                                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-28 17:08                                       ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-28 17:51                                         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-28 18:02                                           ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-28 20:01                                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-05-28 20:09                                               ` Octavian Purdila
2008-05-28 20:16                                                 ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805280259.30931.opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    --to=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).