* WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213
@ 2008-06-04 21:50 Alexander Beregalov
2008-06-04 21:52 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-06-04 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-testers, netdev
I have got the following message:
WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x14b/0x153()
Modules linked in:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc3-00332-gcbff290 #1
[<c0119bbe>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x6c
[<c015a6b6>] ? check_bytes_and_report+0x21/0x8f
[<c015a6b6>] ? check_bytes_and_report+0x21/0x8f
[<c031875b>] tcp_mark_head_lost+0x14b/0x153
[<c031a761>] tcp_ack+0x149e/0x16ef
[<c031cf42>] tcp_rcv_established+0xe1/0x74b
[<c0321d8b>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x25/0x150
[<c0358def>] ? _spin_lock_nested+0x4f/0x57
[<c0323500>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x45b/0x4a3
[<c030ce5b>] ip_local_deliver+0x80/0xcb
[<c030d241>] ip_rcv+0x39b/0x3c2
[<c012bc13>] ? ktime_get_real+0x13/0x2f
[<c02f9338>] netif_receive_skb+0x1ef/0x21d
[<c02c3cce>] nv_napi_poll+0x200/0x612
[<c02fb22f>] net_rx_action+0x77/0x156
[<c011dccb>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x9e
[<c0104781>] do_softirq+0x58/0xa8
[<c013f997>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xab
[<c011dbf6>] irq_exit+0x3b/0x7c
[<c0104890>] do_IRQ+0xbf/0xd4
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4c
[<c010362e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4c
[<c0101937>] ? default_idle+0x2d/0x4c
[<c010186d>] cpu_idle+0x61/0x8e
[<c034ee15>] rest_init+0x61/0x63
=======================
---[ end trace 8a9d96a829374c21 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2585 tcp_ack+0xd19/0x16ef()
Modules linked in:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.26-rc3-00332-gcbff290 #1
[<c0119bbe>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x6c
[<c0358e43>] ? _spin_lock+0x4c/0x53
[<c02fbca4>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x279/0x2a1
[<c031020c>] ? ip_finish_output+0x20a/0x242
[<c0310ddf>] ? ip_output+0x66/0x6a
[<c030ee65>] ? ip_local_out+0x18/0x1b
[<c0311066>] ? ip_queue_xmit+0x283/0x2e5
[<c015b270>] ? __slab_alloc+0xb4/0x513
[<c0319fdc>] tcp_ack+0xd19/0x16ef
[<c031cf42>] tcp_rcv_established+0xe1/0x74b
[<c0321d8b>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x25/0x150
[<c0358def>] ? _spin_lock_nested+0x4f/0x57
[<c0323500>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x45b/0x4a3
[<c030ce5b>] ip_local_deliver+0x80/0xcb
[<c030d241>] ip_rcv+0x39b/0x3c2
[<c012bc13>] ? ktime_get_real+0x13/0x2f
[<c02f9338>] netif_receive_skb+0x1ef/0x21d
[<c02c3cce>] nv_napi_poll+0x200/0x612
[<c02fb22f>] net_rx_action+0x77/0x156
[<c011dccb>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x9e
[<c0104781>] do_softirq+0x58/0xa8
[<c013f997>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xab
[<c011dbf6>] irq_exit+0x3b/0x7c
[<c0104890>] do_IRQ+0xbf/0xd4
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4c
[<c010362e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4c
[<c0101937>] ? default_idle+0x2d/0x4c
[<c010186d>] cpu_idle+0x61/0x8e
[<c034ee15>] rest_init+0x61/0x63
=======================
---[ end trace 8a9d96a829374c21 ]---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213
2008-06-04 21:50 WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213 Alexander Beregalov
@ 2008-06-04 21:52 ` David Miller
2008-06-04 22:29 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-06-04 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: a.beregalov; +Cc: kernel-testers, netdev
From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:50:49 +0400
> I have got the following message:
We need to know the exact kernel version you were running, what
kinds of things the system was doing at the time, etc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213
2008-06-04 21:52 ` David Miller
@ 2008-06-04 22:29 ` Alexander Beregalov
[not found] ` <a4423d670806041529q6911f68fq68ee9ed8f8f50139-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-06-04 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: kernel-testers, netdev
2008/6/5 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
> From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:50:49 +0400
>
>> I have got the following message:
>
> We need to know the exact kernel version you were running, what
> kinds of things the system was doing at the time, etc.
>
It is 2.6.26-rc3-00332-gcbff290.
Host runs as a NFS server and rtorrent client.
That is all network activity on it.
I do not know what system was doing at this time, I have found this
warning only after some time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213
[not found] ` <a4423d670806041529q6911f68fq68ee9ed8f8f50139-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-06-06 13:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806061509530.16829-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-06-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Beregalov
Cc: David Miller, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Netdev
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> 2008/6/5 David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>:
> > From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:50:49 +0400
> >
> >> I have got the following message:
> >
> > We need to know the exact kernel version you were running, what
> > kinds of things the system was doing at the time, etc.
> >
>
> It is 2.6.26-rc3-00332-gcbff290.
> Host runs as a NFS server and rtorrent client.
> That is all network activity on it.
> I do not know what system was doing at this time, I have found this
> warning only after some time.
Thanks for reporting though I'm afraid that until there's somebody able
to reproduce it at least semi-often, this will remain unsolved. It's
probably another reno all-segments already sacked_out situation where then
one of them gets marked as lost in addition to that similar to the
tcp_simple_retransmit that is already fixed in the kernel you're using.
...In case you're worried, I'd say it has been there years and it won't
corrupt anything anyway and the situation resolved itself on some later
executed path (otherwise you'd see more than those two messages). They're
visible only because I recently (in 2.6.23 or .24) started tracking these
invariants by making them to complain and number of things have been
already fixed because of that :-).
It seems that there is a small number of reports @ kerneloops.org for
this same place but the count is noticably smaller (nearly by magnitude)
than what it has been with the same type issues that were finally fixed
couple of days ago, ie., after months of waiting. So there might not be
some near-term breakthrough coming up :-).
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806061509530.16829-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-04 18:55 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-07-04 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: David Miller, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Netdev
It looks similar.
WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x15c/0x164()
Modules linked in: i2c_nforce2
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-00089-ge1441b9-dirty #1
[<c0119f15>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x7b
[<c01348dc>] ? mark_held_locks+0x4e/0x66
[<c011e518>] ? local_bh_enable+0xcf/0xe6
[<c0134a50>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd0/0x10d
[<c031f8c5>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x2cd/0x300
[<c0336968>] ? ip_finish_output+0x20c/0x244
[<c0336a06>] ? ip_output+0x66/0x6a
[<c0135b9e>] ? __lock_acquire+0xc26/0xc35
[<c033e5e1>] tcp_mark_head_lost+0x15c/0x164
[<c034064c>] tcp_ack+0x14ff/0x1760
[<c0342ffa>] tcp_rcv_established+0xdc/0x96a
[<c0348807>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x25/0x14e
[<c0383159>] ? _spin_lock_nested+0x4f/0x57
[<c0348c2a>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x2fa/0x492
[<c0332b42>] ip_local_deliver+0x7d/0xcd
[<c0332a9e>] ip_rcv+0x352/0x379
[<c012c918>] ? ktime_get_real+0x13/0x2f
[<c031eecb>] netif_receive_skb+0x1ec/0x21a
[<c032a9d4>] ? eth_type_trans+0x28/0xc7
[<c02e3a2e>] nv_napi_poll+0x1fa/0x618
[<c0134a50>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd0/0x10d
[<c031df80>] net_rx_action+0x8b/0x14e
[<c011e60b>] __do_softirq+0x54/0xa1
[<c013fc13>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xab
[<c010494f>] do_softirq+0x57/0xa6
[<c011e201>] irq_exit+0x3b/0x7c
[<c0104b18>] do_IRQ+0xca/0xe2
[<c0101d2a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4e
[<c0101d2a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4e
[<c0103712>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c0101d2a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4e
[<c0101d2a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x4e
[<c0101d57>] ? default_idle+0x2d/0x4e
[<c0101cfd>] cpu_idle+0x62/0x8f
[<c0375c81>] rest_init+0x61/0x63
=======================
---[ end trace 458274215148af5e ]---
You are right, I have no idea how to reproduce it.
I have two events, once per month.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-04 18:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-04 21:50 WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2213 Alexander Beregalov
2008-06-04 21:52 ` David Miller
2008-06-04 22:29 ` Alexander Beregalov
[not found] ` <a4423d670806041529q6911f68fq68ee9ed8f8f50139-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-06 13:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806061509530.16829-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-04 18:55 ` Alexander Beregalov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).