netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: PATCH: fix bridged 802.3ad bonding
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:06:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080604090633.2a12cecc@extreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080604082425.GA3272@midget.suse.cz>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:24:25 +0200
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:55:19PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I prefer the following because it process all link-local frames through
> > the normal input path. This means the frames will:
> > 	* be filterable by netfilter
> 
> Well, the LACP frames are not filtered by netfilter when there is
> bonding on its own (not part of a bridge), so I don't see why
> this should change when the bond is made part of a bridge.
> 
> Maybe it is a good idea to run the LACP frames through netfilter,
> but I think this should be done consistently in the bonding code,
> whether or not bridging is set up, and probably on the individual
> slave interfaces. It does not make sense to filter bonding's LACP
> frames in ebtables, IMHO.
> 
> > 	* not forwarded across bridge (this is important).
> 
> I thought this was the case with my second patch as well (?)
> 
>  
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c	2008-06-03 21:44:54.000000000 -0700
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c	2008-06-03 21:52:20.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -135,15 +135,12 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct n
> >  		/* Pause frames shouldn't be passed up by driver anyway */
> >  		if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_PAUSE))
> >  			goto drop;
> > -
> > -		/* Process STP BPDU's through normal netif_receive_skb() path */
> > -		if (p->br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP) {
> > -			if (NF_HOOK(PF_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, skb, skb->dev,
> > -				    NULL, br_handle_local_finish))
> > -				return NULL;
> > -			else
> > -				return skb;
> > -		}
> > +
> > +		if (NF_HOOK(PF_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, skb, skb->dev,
> > +			    NULL, br_handle_local_finish))
> > +			return NULL;	/* frame consumed by filter */
> > +		else
> > +			return skb;	/* continue processing */
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	switch (p->state) {
> 
> where did the "if (p->br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP)" condition
> go? Is it not needed? I thought it was there to prevent the STP
> BPDUs from being handled when STP is turned off.
> 

That is already done in br_stp_rcv so the check here was not
needed.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-03 13:21 PATCH: fix bridged 802.3ad bonding Jiri Bohac
2008-06-03 14:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-03 16:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-06-03 19:32   ` Jiri Bohac
2008-06-03 20:13     ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-06-03 21:20       ` Jiri Bohac
2008-06-03 21:22       ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-06-03 21:43         ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-06-04  4:55         ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-06-04  8:24           ` Jiri Bohac
2008-06-04 16:06             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2008-06-05 10:13               ` Jiri Bohac
2008-06-10 22:42                 ` David Miller
2008-06-17 15:33                   ` Jiri Bohac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080604090633.2a12cecc@extreme \
    --to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).