From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
peterz@infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
rjw@sisk.pl, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Subject: Re: [fixed] [patch] Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:33:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080606173339.GA30894@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212772293.23706.22.camel@tng>
* Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> When I apply the locking patch you (Ilpo) wrote, I cannot reproduce
> the error at all in the first 90 minutes of testing. I'll let the test
> run and update the list.
>
> I'm holding out hope that Ingo's report did not have the locking patch
> on the distcc server end - because it certainly makes a difference for
> me.
Hm, the distcc server had the full 3-patch-revert from Ilpo, was that
supposed to fix the problem too, indirectly?
The box is running that 3-patch revert right now as well:
phoenix:~> uptime
19:20:28 up 9:58, 2 users, load average: 7.75, 13.88, 30.95
phoenix:~> uname -a
Linux phoenix 2.6.26-rc4 #2352 SMP Fri Jun 6 09:18:07 CEST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
... and i never saw a single hang today in the 10 hours of uptime this
box has. (and it built a good 500 kernel today) Nor any hang yesterday,
and that was a good 500 kernels too.
You can see it that the box built more than two thousand kernels in the
past few days alone, so it's a rather busy little bee. The other
testboxes built even more kernels - a quad box built and booted 2500
kernels:
#define UTS_VERSION "#2524 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jun 6 19:22:21 CEST 2008"
and i never saw a hang on that box either.
a third box has:
titan:~> uname -a
Linux titan 2.6.26-rc5-00002-g737697d-dirty #2557 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jun 6
19:24:00 CEST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
(this is the one that showed the hang for the first time)
The total count of kernel bootups i did this week for -tip QA was
somewhere between five and ten thousand random build+bootups - and the
only time i got a hang was when i removed the 3-patch-revert
intentionally, on one of the boxes.
Maybe that 3-patch-revert just makes this locking bug a bit less likely
to trigger, by accident? Out tip test-setup is specialized to find
arch/x86 and scheduler bugs, not primarily to find networking bugs. (but
at this test volume, and given that it makes use of distcc, it will
trigger them too.)
i have a rather accurate timeline of when the hang first occured, do we
know the timeline of the introduction of the locking bug by any chance?
Which commit introduced it? (Ilpo's commit log does not say it)
Your test results are compelling nevertheless so i'll do a retest in any
case, with all boxes either running an older kernel or a kernel with the
locking fix.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-06 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-26 11:56 [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 13:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-26 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 14:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 14:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-26 14:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-26 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 16:32 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-26 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 17:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-26 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 21:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-30 16:23 ` Ray Lee
2008-05-26 16:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-28 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-31 14:25 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-05-31 16:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 17:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 17:58 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-05-31 18:37 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 20:25 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-05-31 21:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 21:45 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-06-04 0:10 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-06-04 11:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-04 14:00 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-06-04 15:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-06 9:32 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-06-09 19:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-10 23:26 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-06-11 13:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-19 0:30 ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-05-29 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-29 11:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-29 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-29 13:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-29 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-29 13:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-29 13:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-30 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-30 21:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-30 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-31 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-31 11:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 12:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-31 12:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-31 16:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-31 22:46 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-01 5:51 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-01 6:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-02 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-03 9:40 ` [fixed] [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2008-06-03 14:41 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-03 21:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-03 22:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-03 22:03 ` David Miller
2008-06-03 22:10 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-03 23:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-03 23:54 ` Joe Perches
2008-06-04 6:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-04 2:54 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-04 6:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-05 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-05 18:00 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-05 21:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-05 23:29 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-06 10:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-06 17:11 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-06 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-06 18:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-06 18:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 19:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-06 20:08 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-06 21:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-06 21:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-06 21:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-10 22:49 ` David Miller
2008-06-06 18:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-10 22:32 ` David Miller
2008-06-11 13:10 ` Patrick McManus
2008-06-11 15:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-04 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-04 18:24 ` David Miller
2008-06-04 20:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-04 21:55 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-11 15:06 Alexey Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080606173339.GA30894@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcmanus@ducksong.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).