From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080608.071051.212882594.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080607204325.GJ5609@1wt.eu> <20080608123601.GB10491@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pupilla@hotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org To: w@1wt.eu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49269 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752583AbYFHOKv (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:10:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080608123601.GB10491@1wt.eu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Willy Tarreau Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:36:01 +0200 > Indeed. Most likely it was simply lost somewhere in the e-mail chain. > Then best thing to do is to retransmit it for next batch of patches. > Chris, here's the fix in question. It did not get lost at all, it's perfectly sitting in my networking -stable queue waiting for me to have an opportunity to submit it to the -stable folks after I do some testing. If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what is happening to that patch wrt. stable. I rarely forget to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already. Right now is an unusual situation where I am in a 3 week period of near constant travel, otherwise all of this stuff would have been submitted already. As I stated in another reply to you, that period is ending tomorrow so I should be able to crank out all of these patches to -stable some time this week. Thanks.