From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [TCP]: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT causes leak sockets Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080613.023208.78649628.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080611.165255.242691774.davem@davemloft.net> <20080612.163212.148965080.davem@davemloft.net> <20080613063037.GA16943@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, vgusev@openvz.org, mcmanus@ducksong.com, xemul@openvz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: mingo@elte.hu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55531 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755520AbYFMJcI (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:32:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080613063037.GA16943@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:30:37 +0200 > the 3 reverts have been extensively tested in -tip via: > > # tip/out-of-tree: 9e5b6ca: tcp: revert DEFER_ACCEPT modifications > > and the distcc problems are fixed. (The locking fix alone did not fix it > conclusively in my testing, possibly due to the follow-on observations > outlined in your description.) > > Tested-by: Ingo Molnar I didn't revert all three changes, just the final part of that 3 part series. Please test the patch I actually applied.