From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080614.001206.153530204.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080612.211959.52937006.davem@davemloft.net> <20080614060320.GA18454@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl To: mingo@elte.hu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47491 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752229AbYFNHMH (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:12:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080614060320.GA18454@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:03:20 +0200 > once i added the patch below this new warning went away. I'm wondering > what this difference is about and why your revert differs from Ilpo's. Because I reverted the change we found bugs in. Ilpo sent you a patch which reverted an entire series of changes purely so that we could begin to narrow things down. > It might as well be the right thing to do and the warning just shows > something latent. This is my though still currently because I can't see any reason why the diff you keep posting would cause a device to transmit timeout. It's likely a timing thing or something weird like that.