From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169? Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:47:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20080617023852.M86134@visp.net.lb> References: <20080616193501.M64730@visp.net.lb> <4856C3A7.9070703@cosmosbay.com> <20080616202210.M84100@visp.net.lb> <4856CEDC.6010706@intel.com> <20080616204411.M52834@visp.net.lb> <4856D1D6.7040207@intel.com> <20080616211213.M76390@visp.net.lb> <4856DB1D.80503@cosmosbay.com> <20080616213419.M212@visp.net.lb> <4856DE1F.4090001@cosmosbay.com> <4856DEA7.9060506@cosmosbay.com> <20080616220004.M32074@visp.net.lb> <48571EB2.50301@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from usermail.globalproof.net ([194.146.153.18]:53384 "EHLO usermail.globalproof.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751384AbYFQCrf (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:47:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48571EB2.50301@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:17:22 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote > How often is iptables used on your machine ? On this machine, just 3-4 rules. As i mention before, unloading iptables modules didn't help. > > since the profile was taken. Results may be inaccurate. > > samples % symbol name > > 144449 25.7521 e1000_irq_enable > > I wonder why this one is called so often. If your > interface is really flooded with packets, we should not > exit from NAPI polling... At that moments values RX 82Kpps, TX also around 82Kpps 339 Mbps RX, 337 Mbps TX Average packet ~516 bytes -- Denys Fedoryshchenko Technical Manager Virtual ISP S.A.L.