From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <dada1@cosmosbay.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806170946.17351.denys@visp.net.lb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52056AC4C2@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 02:24, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
First, i catch when tx_deferred_ok increasing, rx_missed_errors also increasing. For example deffered +1 , missed_errors +10.
A bit strange.
> Try turning off Flow Control using ethtool -A ethX rx off tx off autoneg
> off
Well, seems it is a keypoint on new motherboard, but i have to see at peak time still (about 10-14 hours to go).
So the question is, or flow control is broken here, or it is unknown when i must use flow-control and when - not.
Once i had packetloss on e1000 gigabit link, without it.
Now it is packetloss - when i start to use it.
--
------
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
Lebanon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-17 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 19:37 packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169? Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 19:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:20 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:23 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:36 ` Kok, Auke
[not found] ` <20080616204411.M52834@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 20:49 ` Kok, Auke
2008-06-16 20:59 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:13 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
[not found] ` <20080616213419.M212@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 22:08 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 2:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-17 2:47 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 22:08 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 23:24 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17 1:53 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 6:46 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko [this message]
2008-06-17 17:22 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18 0:58 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17 21:04 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18 16:50 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-18 17:03 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:17 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:52 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:15 ` Auke Kok
2008-06-16 20:29 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:26 ` Francois Romieu
2008-06-16 20:37 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-06-16 20:42 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806170946.17351.denys@visp.net.lb \
--to=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).