From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: netlink circular locking dependency Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:43:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20080617134303.GC4632@ff.dom.local> References: <20080616213417.GA14988@ami.dom.local> <4856DF91.30606@trash.net> <1213667154.21932.47.camel@violet.holtmann.net> <4857B30B.8020809@trash.net> <20080617130910.GA4632@ff.dom.local> <4857B720.1070302@trash.net> <20080617132410.GB4632@ff.dom.local> <4857BBB6.6010709@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marcel Holtmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Graf To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:4001 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757328AbYFQNjF (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:39:05 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so3396462ywe.1 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4857BBB6.6010709@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... > I guess that might work. But simply using module references to > prevent the module from going away while the mutex is not held > doesn't appear to be more complicated. O.K. Jarek P.