From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Add the CPU id to skb->queue_mapping's upper 8 bits
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:37:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080624.163742.224488012.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080624232545.11654.65805.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:27:12 -0700
> From: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
>
> This patch adds the CPU index to the upper 8 bits of the queue_mapping in
> the skb. This will support 256 CPUs and 256 Tx queues. The reason for
> this is the qdisc layer can obscure which CPU is generating a certain flow
> of packets, so network drivers don't have any insight which CPU generated a
> particular packet. If the driver knows which CPU generated the packet,
> then it could adjust Rx filtering in the hardware to redirect the packet
> back to the CPU who owns the process that generated this packet.
> Preventing the cache miss and reschedule of a process to a different CPU is
> a big win in network performance, especially at 10 gigabit speeds.
>
> Signed-off-by: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Well:
1) All of this multiqueue stuff is going away with my changes in
net-tx-2.6
2) This CPU number is going to be wrong half of the time.
For #2, when TCP is processing ACKs, it sends packets out from
whichever CPU the ACK landed on.
So you could end up retargetting the RX flow back and forth between
cpus. The cpu that sends the packet into the device layer is far
from the cpu that should be used to target the RX flow at.
So this idea is pretty seriously flawed and the infrastructure it's
using is going away anyways.
It also adds all sorts of arbitray limitations (256 queues and cpus? I
already have systems coming to me with more than 256 cpus)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 23:27 [PATCH 1/2] net: Add the CPU id to skb->queue_mapping's upper 8 bits Jeff Kirsher
2008-06-24 23:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: Fix consumers of skb->queue_mapping to use lower " Jeff Kirsher
2008-06-24 23:37 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-06-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: Add the CPU id to skb->queue_mapping's upper " Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-06-25 23:37 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080624.163742.224488012.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox