From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: net-sched 00/06: dynamically sized class hashes v2 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20080703161403.GA2637@ami.dom.local> References: <20080703151600.26225.3394.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devik@cdi.cz To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:50070 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752773AbYGCQMs (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:12:48 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so552080waf.23 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080703151600.26225.3394.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:16:01PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... > The patches need the two filter destruction fixes that went into > net-2.6.git to apply cleanly, so they won't apply until net-2.6.git > is merged into net-next-2.6.git. Patrick, I just was about to write that some patches (1, 3, 5) give checkpatch warnings... (but no big deal). I'll try to look at this later, but let's say: if I don't write means I'm OK with all these patches. Thanks again, Jarek P. BTW: I wonder why cbq and htb have "common", while hfsc "cl_common"?