From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:47:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807040147.11148.opurdila@ixiacom.com> (raw)
Hi everybody,
IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol [1] requires hardware timestamping support
for both RX and TX frames. It seems that in Linux we do not have the support
required for this protocol to be implemented.
Any feedback on the approach we are planing to take is greatly appreciated. We
will follow with a patch at some point, but I just want to check with you
gurus early, to avoid potential design flaws. If a patch is preferred for
commenting on, then please ignore this and will come back later with the
patch.
1. RX path
- add a new field in skb to keep the hardware stamp (hwstamp)
- add a new socket flag to enable RX stamping
- add a new control message to retrieve the hwstamp from the skb to user-space
application (for UDP and maybe PF_PACKET)
2. TX path - this is a bit more complicated since we need a new mechanism to
wait for a packet transmission on wire, from users-space.
- add a new flag for the skb to request TX stamping
- add a new control message to propagate the TX stamping request from
userspace to the skb
- when the driver will send the packet will get the stamp from the TX
completion ring; the driver will then propagate the stamp either to
(a) the skb stamp field, or (b) some special structure - this to avoid keeping
the skb around
- the special structure or the skb will be linked to a special queue in the
socket and a POLLPRI event will be generated
- the application will use recvmsg and will receive a new control message
which contains the timestamp from the socket special queue
We will probably need to associate a cookie with each TX stamping control
message which will be retrieve in the later control message, so that the
application can match send packets with timestamps.
[1] http://ieee1588.nist.gov/tutorial-basic.pdf
Thanks,
tavi
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 22:47 Octavian Purdila [this message]
2008-07-03 23:24 ` [RFC] support for IEEE 1588 Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-03 23:40 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-07-04 0:15 ` Rick Jones
2008-07-04 0:42 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-07-04 11:24 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 13:37 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-07-05 0:21 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-07-07 12:34 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-07-09 15:31 ` Lennart Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807040147.11148.opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--to=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).