From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: setsockopt()
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:33:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080707143306.56dcdb2e@extreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48728B09.1050801@citi.umich.edu>
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:30:49 -0400
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:18:38 -0400
> > Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to ask a question regarding socket options, more
> >> specifically send and receive buffer sizes.
> >>
> >> One simple question: (on the server-side) is it true that, to set
> >> send/receive buffer size, setsockopt() can only be called before
> >> listen()? From what I can tell, if I were to set socket options for the
> >> listening socket, they get inherited by the socket created during the
> >> accept(). However, when I try to change send/receive buffer size for the
> >> new socket, they take no affect.
> >>
> >> The server in question is the NFSD server in the kernel. NFSD's code
> >> tries to adjust the buffer size (in order to have TCP increase the
> >> window size appropriately) but it does so after the new socket is
> >> created. It leads to the fact that the TCP window doesn't open beyond
> >> the TCP's "default" sysctl value (that would be the 2nd value in the
> >> triple net.ipv4.tcp_rmem, which on our system is set to 64KB). We
> >> changed the code so that setsockopt() is called for the listening socket
> >> is created and we set the buffer sizes to something bigger, like 8MB.
> >> Then we try to increase the buffer size for each socket created by the
> >> accept() but what is seen on the network trace is that window size
> >> doesn't open beyond the values used for the listening socket.
> >>
> >
> > It would be better if NFSD stayed out of doign setsockopt and just
> > let the sender/receiver autotuning work?
> >
> Auto-tuning would be guided by the sysctl values that are set for all
> applications. I could be wrong but what I see is that unless an
> application does a setsockopt(), its window is bound by the default
> sysctl value. If it is true, than it is not acceptable. It means that in
> order for NFSD to achieve a large enough window it needs to modify TCP's
> sysctl value which will effect all other applications.
>
Auto tuning starts at the default and will expand to the max allowed.
If you set a value with setsockopt, then the kernel just uses that value
and does no tuning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-07 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 18:18 setsockopt() Olga Kornievskaia
2008-07-07 21:24 ` setsockopt() Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-07 21:30 ` setsockopt() Olga Kornievskaia
2008-07-07 21:33 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2008-07-07 21:49 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-08 4:54 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-08 6:02 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-08 6:29 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-08 6:43 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-08 7:03 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-08 18:48 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 18:10 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-09 18:34 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-10 2:50 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-10 17:26 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-11 0:50 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-08 20:48 ` setsockopt() Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-08 22:05 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 5:25 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 5:47 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 6:03 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 18:11 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-09 18:43 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 22:28 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-10 1:06 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-10 20:05 ` [PATCH] Documentation: clarify tcp_{r,w}mem sysctl docs J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-10 23:50 ` David Miller
2008-07-08 20:12 ` setsockopt() Jim Rees
2008-07-08 21:54 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-08 23:51 ` setsockopt() Jim Rees
2008-07-09 0:07 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-07 22:50 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-07 23:00 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-07 23:27 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 1:15 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 1:48 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-08 1:44 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-08 3:33 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-08 18:16 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 19:10 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
[not found] ` <349f35ee0807090255s58fd040bne265ee117d06d397@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-09 10:38 ` setsockopt() Jerry Chu
2008-07-07 21:32 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-08 1:17 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080707143306.56dcdb2e@extreme \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rees@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).