From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: Add seq and ack numbers to TCP_INFO Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:49:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20080709104934.390cd81b@speedy> References: <396556a20805301217k293e5718h6bbf02bfe069003@europa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Adam Langley" Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([216.93.170.194]:44394 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751194AbYGIRtg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:49:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <396556a20805301217k293e5718h6bbf02bfe069003@europa> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:23:43 -0700 "Adam Langley" wrote: > TCP: Add seq and ack numbers to TCP_INFO > > No ABI breakage: Userspace specifies the size of the structure that they're > expecting, and the new fields are at the end, so existing code should function > just fine as we'll truncate the new struct tcp_info to fit. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Langley Of what possible use is this to an application? I worry that applications would come to expect or use certain characteristics of the network and TCP which would be broken by later changes.