From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
aglo@citi.umich.edu, shemminger@vyatta.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, rees@umich.edu, bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: setsockopt()
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:50:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080710205045.8b8a0eee.billfink@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48764629.6090209@hp.com>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Rick Jones wrote:
> > In my own network benchmarking experience, I've generally gotten the
> > best performance results when the nuttcp application and the NIC
> > interrupts are on the same CPU, which I understood was because of
> > cache effects.
>
> Interestingly enough I have a slightly different experience:
>
> *) single-transaction, single-stream TCP_RR - best when app and NIC use
> same core
>
> *) bulk transfer - either TCP_STREAM or aggregate TCP_RR:
> a) enough CPU on one core to reach max tput, best when same core
> b) not enough, tput max when app and NIC on separate cores,
> preferably cores sharing some cache
>
> That is in the context of either maximizing throughput or minimizing
> latency. If the context is most efficient transfer, then in all cases
> my experience thusfar agrees with yours.
Yes, I was talking about single stream bulk data transfers, where the
CPU was not a limiting factor (just barely when doing full 10-GigE
line rate transfers with 9000-byte jumbo frames).
On multiple stream tests there can be a benefit to spreading the load
across multiple cores.
-Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 18:18 setsockopt() Olga Kornievskaia
2008-07-07 21:24 ` setsockopt() Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-07 21:30 ` setsockopt() Olga Kornievskaia
2008-07-07 21:33 ` setsockopt() Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-07 21:49 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-08 4:54 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-08 6:02 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-08 6:29 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-08 6:43 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-08 7:03 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-08 18:48 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 18:10 ` setsockopt() Roland Dreier
2008-07-09 18:34 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-10 2:50 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-10 17:26 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-11 0:50 ` Bill Fink [this message]
2008-07-08 20:48 ` setsockopt() Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-08 22:05 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 5:25 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 5:47 ` setsockopt() Bill Fink
2008-07-09 6:03 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 18:11 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-09 18:43 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-09 22:28 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-10 1:06 ` setsockopt() Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-10 20:05 ` [PATCH] Documentation: clarify tcp_{r,w}mem sysctl docs J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-10 23:50 ` David Miller
2008-07-08 20:12 ` setsockopt() Jim Rees
2008-07-08 21:54 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-08 23:51 ` setsockopt() Jim Rees
2008-07-09 0:07 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-07 22:50 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-07 23:00 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-07 23:27 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 1:15 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 1:48 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-08 1:44 ` setsockopt() David Miller
2008-07-08 3:33 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
2008-07-08 18:16 ` setsockopt() Rick Jones
2008-07-08 19:10 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
[not found] ` <349f35ee0807090255s58fd040bne265ee117d06d397@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-09 10:38 ` setsockopt() Jerry Chu
2008-07-07 21:32 ` setsockopt() J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-08 1:17 ` setsockopt() John Heffner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080710205045.8b8a0eee.billfink@mindspring.com \
--to=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).