From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: TXQ real_num_tx_queues comments/questions Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080715.023954.234208581.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1216113923.3535.14.camel@johannes.berg> <20080715.022854.55875400.davem@davemloft.net> <1216114621.3535.18.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1216114621.3535.18.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:37:01 +0200 > From mac80211's POV it's just that select_queue must have known > about the removed queue when the requeue is done. And we can defer > the requeue to a workqueue. Ok. So you're proposing the requeue be deferred to a workqueue and what else? RCU protection around real_num_tx_queues access? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html