From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: 8169 Intermittent ifup Failure Issue With RTL8102E Chipset in Intel's New D945GCLF Atom Board (Not the Initial Modprobe Crash, Another Problem) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20080715185646.GA27023@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <4861800B.90703@nscus.com> <48777BC3.6090108@dell.com> <1216052460.23392.14.camel@localhost> <200807142152.26163.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> <487BB065.3020709@dell.com> <1216068344.23392.19.camel@localhost> <487BBE77.7050702@dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kasper Sandberg , Rolf Eike Beer , Marcus Sundberg , Michael Grollman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org To: Mario Limonciello Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <487BBE77.7050702@dell.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Mario Limonciello : [...] > If I was to guess (I didn't actually work out which one yours identifies > as), most likely your NIC isn't caught in my check for MAC_VER_13 or > MAC_VER_16, but Francois's patch has: +1 (actually this change was contributed by Marcus Sundberg: see the Signed-off-by and/or the patch named 0003-r8169-avoid-thrashing-PCI-conf-space-above-RTL_GIGA.patch) I doubt that it will break anybody's 8101 (resp. 8102) but I would welcome a report from a 8101/8102 owner before sending it upstream. Sorry for disturbing linux-pci. -- Ueimor