* Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken
[not found] <20080718195352.e562a00f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2008-07-20 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-20 4:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-07-20 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML, Jeff Garzik, netdev
On Friday, 18 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since next-20080717:
>
> Restored tree: ttydev.
>
> Temporarily dropped tree: acpi (confusion about its source).
>
> Most of the differences were conflicts moving from tree to tree as some
> of the trees are now merged into Linus' tree. Most have been inflicted
> on the driver-core and usb trees. I have not notified these separately.
>
> Because of the moving of conflicts around it is difficult to tell when
> they are going away (though I assume some are).
>
> The driver-core tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The usb tree inherited a build fix patch from the pci tree.
>
> The x86 tree gained a trivial conflict against Linus' tree but it was in
> a commit that is still being reverted.
>
> The ocsf2 tree gained several conflicts against Linus' tree because what
> was sent to Linus was not the same as what is in linuxt-next.
>
> The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree, the sparc tree and the
> mips tree.
>
> The semaphore-removal tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree that
> required the reversion of two commits.
>
> The ttydev tree had two patches that didn't apply and gained conflicts
> against the wireless tree and the usb tree (4). It also required a build
> fix patch.
>
> Lots of conflicts have gone from the x86 and ubifs trees.
>
> I have also applied the following patches for known problems:
>
> sparc64: sysdev API change fallout
> sparc32: smp_call_function API change fallout (this has already
> been fixed in the upstream sparc tree and comes from an incomplete merge
> on my part).
>
> This tree fails to build for ARCH=sparc (i.e. 32bit) with a 64bit gcc
> v3.4.5 - it tries to use the 64bit header files. This may be an artifact
> of one of my merge fixups, but I don't actually think so.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit db99b98885e717454feef1c6868b27d3f23c2e7c
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Wed May 14 17:04:16 2008 -0700
sky2: put PHY in sleep when down
and
commit a068c0adf2fe28b324bca87f85d27af7f993cdaf
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Wed May 14 17:04:17 2008 -0700
sky2: pci power savings
break Wake-on-LAN on my test box using sky2. More specifically, with these
two commits applied the box hangs solid during hibernation/power off
while executing the sky2 callbacks.
The adapter is reported as 88E8056 (Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe mainboard).
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken
2008-07-20 0:20 ` linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-07-20 4:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-20 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2008-07-20 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:20:10 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, 18 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since next-20080717:
> >
> > Restored tree: ttydev.
> >
> > Temporarily dropped tree: acpi (confusion about its source).
> >
> > Most of the differences were conflicts moving from tree to tree as some
> > of the trees are now merged into Linus' tree. Most have been inflicted
> > on the driver-core and usb trees. I have not notified these separately.
> >
> > Because of the moving of conflicts around it is difficult to tell when
> > they are going away (though I assume some are).
> >
> > The driver-core tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The usb tree inherited a build fix patch from the pci tree.
> >
> > The x86 tree gained a trivial conflict against Linus' tree but it was in
> > a commit that is still being reverted.
> >
> > The ocsf2 tree gained several conflicts against Linus' tree because what
> > was sent to Linus was not the same as what is in linuxt-next.
> >
> > The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree, the sparc tree and the
> > mips tree.
> >
> > The semaphore-removal tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree that
> > required the reversion of two commits.
> >
> > The ttydev tree had two patches that didn't apply and gained conflicts
> > against the wireless tree and the usb tree (4). It also required a build
> > fix patch.
> >
> > Lots of conflicts have gone from the x86 and ubifs trees.
> >
> > I have also applied the following patches for known problems:
> >
> > sparc64: sysdev API change fallout
> > sparc32: smp_call_function API change fallout (this has already
> > been fixed in the upstream sparc tree and comes from an incomplete merge
> > on my part).
> >
> > This tree fails to build for ARCH=sparc (i.e. 32bit) with a 64bit gcc
> > v3.4.5 - it tries to use the 64bit header files. This may be an artifact
> > of one of my merge fixups, but I don't actually think so.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit db99b98885e717454feef1c6868b27d3f23c2e7c
> Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Date: Wed May 14 17:04:16 2008 -0700
>
> sky2: put PHY in sleep when down
>
> and
>
> commit a068c0adf2fe28b324bca87f85d27af7f993cdaf
> Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Date: Wed May 14 17:04:17 2008 -0700
>
> sky2: pci power savings
>
> break Wake-on-LAN on my test box using sky2. More specifically, with these
> two commits applied the box hangs solid during hibernation/power off
> while executing the sky2 callbacks.
>
> The adapter is reported as 88E8056 (Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe mainboard).
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Wake-on-lan from suspend or wake-on-lan from shutdown? which is the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken
2008-07-20 4:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2008-07-20 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200807201739.22919.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-07-20 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
Kernel Testers List
On Sunday, 20 of July 2008, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:20:10 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 18 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since next-20080717:
> > >
> > > Restored tree: ttydev.
> > >
> > > Temporarily dropped tree: acpi (confusion about its source).
> > >
> > > Most of the differences were conflicts moving from tree to tree as some
> > > of the trees are now merged into Linus' tree. Most have been inflicted
> > > on the driver-core and usb trees. I have not notified these separately.
> > >
> > > Because of the moving of conflicts around it is difficult to tell when
> > > they are going away (though I assume some are).
> > >
> > > The driver-core tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > The usb tree inherited a build fix patch from the pci tree.
> > >
> > > The x86 tree gained a trivial conflict against Linus' tree but it was in
> > > a commit that is still being reverted.
> > >
> > > The ocsf2 tree gained several conflicts against Linus' tree because what
> > > was sent to Linus was not the same as what is in linuxt-next.
> > >
> > > The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree, the sparc tree and the
> > > mips tree.
> > >
> > > The semaphore-removal tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree that
> > > required the reversion of two commits.
> > >
> > > The ttydev tree had two patches that didn't apply and gained conflicts
> > > against the wireless tree and the usb tree (4). It also required a build
> > > fix patch.
> > >
> > > Lots of conflicts have gone from the x86 and ubifs trees.
> > >
> > > I have also applied the following patches for known problems:
> > >
> > > sparc64: sysdev API change fallout
> > > sparc32: smp_call_function API change fallout (this has already
> > > been fixed in the upstream sparc tree and comes from an incomplete merge
> > > on my part).
> > >
> > > This tree fails to build for ARCH=sparc (i.e. 32bit) with a 64bit gcc
> > > v3.4.5 - it tries to use the 64bit header files. This may be an artifact
> > > of one of my merge fixups, but I don't actually think so.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit db99b98885e717454feef1c6868b27d3f23c2e7c
> > Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Wed May 14 17:04:16 2008 -0700
> >
> > sky2: put PHY in sleep when down
> >
> > and
> >
> > commit a068c0adf2fe28b324bca87f85d27af7f993cdaf
> > Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Wed May 14 17:04:17 2008 -0700
> >
> > sky2: pci power savings
> >
> > break Wake-on-LAN on my test box using sky2. More specifically, with these
> > two commits applied the box hangs solid during hibernation/power off
> > while executing the sky2 callbacks.
> >
> > The adapter is reported as 88E8056 (Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe mainboard).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
>
> Wake-on-lan from suspend or wake-on-lan from shutdown? which is the problem.
In both cases (ie. hibernation and shutdown) if I run 'ethtool -s eth0 wol g'
before the operation, the box will hang solid while executing either
sky2_suspend() or sky2_shutdown().
So far, I have verified that it happens after sky2_wol_init(), during the
execution of sky2_power_aux(). However, if sky2_power_aux() is commented
out, the box hangs while executing pci_enable_wake().
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken
[not found] ` <200807201739.22919.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-21 0:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-07-21 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
Kernel Testers List, Jeff Garzik, David Miller
On Sunday, 20 of July 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 of July 2008, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:20:10 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday, 18 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since next-20080717:
> > > >
> > > > Restored tree: ttydev.
> > > >
> > > > Temporarily dropped tree: acpi (confusion about its source).
> > > >
> > > > Most of the differences were conflicts moving from tree to tree as some
> > > > of the trees are now merged into Linus' tree. Most have been inflicted
> > > > on the driver-core and usb trees. I have not notified these separately.
> > > >
> > > > Because of the moving of conflicts around it is difficult to tell when
> > > > they are going away (though I assume some are).
> > > >
> > > > The driver-core tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> > > >
> > > > The usb tree inherited a build fix patch from the pci tree.
> > > >
> > > > The x86 tree gained a trivial conflict against Linus' tree but it was in
> > > > a commit that is still being reverted.
> > > >
> > > > The ocsf2 tree gained several conflicts against Linus' tree because what
> > > > was sent to Linus was not the same as what is in linuxt-next.
> > > >
> > > > The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree, the sparc tree and the
> > > > mips tree.
> > > >
> > > > The semaphore-removal tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree that
> > > > required the reversion of two commits.
> > > >
> > > > The ttydev tree had two patches that didn't apply and gained conflicts
> > > > against the wireless tree and the usb tree (4). It also required a build
> > > > fix patch.
> > > >
> > > > Lots of conflicts have gone from the x86 and ubifs trees.
> > > >
> > > > I have also applied the following patches for known problems:
> > > >
> > > > sparc64: sysdev API change fallout
> > > > sparc32: smp_call_function API change fallout (this has already
> > > > been fixed in the upstream sparc tree and comes from an incomplete merge
> > > > on my part).
> > > >
> > > > This tree fails to build for ARCH=sparc (i.e. 32bit) with a 64bit gcc
> > > > v3.4.5 - it tries to use the 64bit header files. This may be an artifact
> > > > of one of my merge fixups, but I don't actually think so.
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > commit db99b98885e717454feef1c6868b27d3f23c2e7c
> > > Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date: Wed May 14 17:04:16 2008 -0700
> > >
> > > sky2: put PHY in sleep when down
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > commit a068c0adf2fe28b324bca87f85d27af7f993cdaf
> > > Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date: Wed May 14 17:04:17 2008 -0700
> > >
> > > sky2: pci power savings
> > >
> > > break Wake-on-LAN on my test box using sky2. More specifically, with these
> > > two commits applied the box hangs solid during hibernation/power off
> > > while executing the sky2 callbacks.
> > >
> > > The adapter is reported as 88E8056 (Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe mainboard).
> >
> > Wake-on-lan from suspend or wake-on-lan from shutdown? which is the problem.
>
> In both cases (ie. hibernation and shutdown) if I run 'ethtool -s eth0 wol g'
> before the operation, the box will hang solid while executing either
> sky2_suspend() or sky2_shutdown().
>
> So far, I have verified that it happens after sky2_wol_init(), during the
> execution of sky2_power_aux(). However, if sky2_power_aux() is commented
> out, the box hangs while executing pci_enable_wake().
I've just verified that the problem is caused by commit
db99b98885e717454feef1c6868b27d3f23c2e7c ("sky2: put PHY in sleep when down").
After reverting this commit, the problem goes away.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-21 0:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080718195352.e562a00f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-07-20 0:20 ` linux-next: Tree for July 18: sky2 WOL broken Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-20 4:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-20 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200807201739.22919.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-21 0:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).