From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bisected] kernel panic 2.6.22 -> 2.6.26-rc9+
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:00:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080722220056.234af367.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080723045230.GD29189@1wt.eu>
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:52:31 +0200 Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 02:55:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:51:06 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > --- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h~a
> > > > +++ a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> > > > @@ -277,9 +277,16 @@ static inline int constant_fls(int x)
> > > > * the clz instruction for much better code efficiency.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > -#define fls(x) \
> > > > +#define __fls(x) \
> > > > ( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
> > > > ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc"); 32-__r; }) )
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Implement fls() in C so that 64-bit args are suitably truncated */
> > > > +static inline int fls(int x)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return __fls(x);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Well, I like it more as it fixes all possible places instead of only
> > > fls64().
> > >
> > > But... can't we just move the #define body into the inline fls(x)?
> > > Will there be other users of __fls(x)? It seems the
> > > __builtin_constant_p(x) works for inline functions.
> >
> > Could. That was a minimal&safe thing.
> >
> > > The above patch fixes the kernel panic, too.
> >
> > OK, thanks.
>
> Andrew,
>
> have you sent your patch to Linus ? I haven't seen it merged yet, and
> I'd like to get it into -stable too.
This one?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arm's fls() is implemented as a macro, causing it to misbehave when passed
64-bit arguments. Fix.
Cc: Nickolay Vinogradov <nickolay@protei.ru>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/asm-arm/bitops.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN include/asm-arm/bitops.h~arm-fix-fls-for-64-bit-arguments include/asm-arm/bitops.h
--- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h~arm-fix-fls-for-64-bit-arguments
+++ a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
@@ -277,9 +277,16 @@ static inline int constant_fls(int x)
* the clz instruction for much better code efficiency.
*/
-#define fls(x) \
+#define __fls(x) \
( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc"); 32-__r; }) )
+
+/* Implement fls() in C so that 64-bit args are suitably truncated */
+static inline int fls(int x)
+{
+ return __fls(x);
+}
+
#define ffs(x) ({ unsigned long __t = (x); fls(__t & -__t); })
#define __ffs(x) (ffs(x) - 1)
#define ffz(x) __ffs( ~(x) )
_
Nope, I'm just kind of sitting on it. I'll put a stable@kernel.org tag
on it and send it to Russell I guess.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-13 0:28 [bisected] kernel panic 2.6.22 -> 2.6.26-rc9+ Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13 8:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-13 10:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13 18:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-13 21:51 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-23 4:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-07-23 5:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-23 5:06 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080722220056.234af367.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).