netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bisected] kernel panic 2.6.22 -> 2.6.26-rc9+
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:06:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080723050603.GG29189@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080722220056.234af367.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:00:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:52:31 +0200 Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 02:55:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:51:06 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > --- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h~a
> > > > > +++ a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> > > > > @@ -277,9 +277,16 @@ static inline int constant_fls(int x)
> > > > >   * the clz instruction for much better code efficiency.
> > > > >   */
> > > > >  
> > > > > -#define fls(x) \
> > > > > +#define __fls(x) \
> > > > >  	( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
> > > > >  	  ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc"); 32-__r; }) )
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* Implement fls() in C so that 64-bit args are suitably truncated */
> > > > > +static inline int fls(int x)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	return __fls(x);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > 
> > > > Well, I like it more as it fixes all possible places instead of only
> > > > fls64().
> > > > 
> > > > But... can't we just move the #define body into the inline fls(x)?
> > > > Will there be other users of __fls(x)? It seems the
> > > > __builtin_constant_p(x) works for inline functions.
> > > 
> > > Could.  That was a minimal&safe thing.
> > > 
> > > > The above patch fixes the kernel panic, too.
> > > 
> > > OK, thanks.
> > 
> > Andrew,
> > 
> > have you sent your patch to Linus ? I haven't seen it merged yet, and
> > I'd like to get it into -stable too.
> 
> This one?
> 
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> 
> arm's fls() is implemented as a macro, causing it to misbehave when passed
> 64-bit arguments.  Fix.
> 
> Cc: Nickolay Vinogradov <nickolay@protei.ru>
> Tested-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  include/asm-arm/bitops.h |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -puN include/asm-arm/bitops.h~arm-fix-fls-for-64-bit-arguments include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> --- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h~arm-fix-fls-for-64-bit-arguments
> +++ a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> @@ -277,9 +277,16 @@ static inline int constant_fls(int x)
>   * the clz instruction for much better code efficiency.
>   */
>  
> -#define fls(x) \
> +#define __fls(x) \
>  	( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
>  	  ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc"); 32-__r; }) )
> +
> +/* Implement fls() in C so that 64-bit args are suitably truncated */
> +static inline int fls(int x)
> +{
> +	return __fls(x);
> +}
> +
>  #define ffs(x) ({ unsigned long __t = (x); fls(__t & -__t); })
>  #define __ffs(x) (ffs(x) - 1)
>  #define ffz(x) __ffs( ~(x) )
> _
> 

yes, precisely this one.

> Nope, I'm just kind of sitting on it.  I'll put a stable@kernel.org tag
> on it and send it to Russell I guess.

Perfect, thanks!
Willy


      reply	other threads:[~2008-07-23  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-13  0:28 [bisected] kernel panic 2.6.22 -> 2.6.26-rc9+ Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13  8:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-13 10:48   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13 18:22     ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-13 21:51       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-13 21:55         ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-23  4:52           ` Willy Tarreau
2008-07-23  5:00             ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-23  5:06               ` Willy Tarreau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080723050603.GG29189@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).