From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [patch 12/12] Configure out ethtool support Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:01:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20080730140136.42223e3c@extreme> References: <200807301939.m6UJd5lT012610@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20080730133727.7774de6a@extreme> <20080730224849.59852c68@surf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, mpm@selenic.com To: Thomas Petazzoni Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([216.93.170.194]:40562 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbYG3VB2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:01:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080730224849.59852c68@surf> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:48:49 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Le Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:37:27 -0700, > Stephen Hemminger a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > This option needs to be forced on when bridging or bonding is > > selected. >=20 > Do you mean something like the following fixup patch ? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Thomas >=20 > Make sure ETHTOOL support is selected when bonding and bridging are > requested. Yes, but still concerned that the loss of functionality. The kernel dev= elopers have been preaching to get rid of module parameters for configuration, = and use a standard interfaces such as ethtool;then the embedded folks want to s= ave a meager 6K.